The *only* result of black gay activist Keith Boykin's innuendo campaign disguised as "outing" of select black pastors, was a week of titillating gossip. When the high gays get from overindulgence with sexual preference isn't enough, they drop it a couple of notches and obsess over who's really "straight" and who's really "gay". Why is determining where an individual is on the straight-o-gay meter so important to activist homosexuals? Why must they know exactly what type of sex, how many times a week and with whom a person is having sexual relations with? The "interest = involvement" argument has been leveled so many times by activists at myself and others, I guess using it against them would be like returning the favor.
I've said many times before, the homosexual movement, despite its fruitless attempts to paint and portray itself as normal, has never risen above being defined by the unnatural sex act. Its their one claim to dubious fame. By adopting an identity shaped and cultivated by the manner of sexual expression homosexuals exchange the truth of God for a lie. It is a debasing reduction of the uniqueness of humanity in the image of God to a level with animals who mate on mere instinct[cf Romans 1:22-24]. Indeed, gay activists have cited everything from monkeys to rams to penguins as evidence that homosexuality is "normal". Ron Schlittler, president of Parents and Friend of Gays and Lesbians (PFLAG) made such an unbecoming comparison in his response to an email critic. But the real problem is that homoSEXuality is only about sex. Not love, not identity, only sex. The case made using animals is problematic no matter how it is spun. On one hand, it points to unnatural behavior, but does not prove so-called orientation. A number of scientists have argued that, for example, in the case with female monkeys, the alleged "sexual" activity is nothing more than greeting, not pleasure as homosexual activists contend. One wonders why animals are even cited.
Maybe that's why activists at
sex exgaywatch are currently gabbing over sexual determinants.
Exgaywatch's current gossipfest is about newly ungayed author K. Godfrey Easter. Easter recently openly denounced his homosexuality. This is a funny story, but they don't get it. Its also indicative of how evil the homosexual movement can be when someone leaves its clutches, no matter how immersed in it they were before. Before I continue with K. Godfrey Easter, let me share two little scriptures from the Bible relative to my above point (1 Peter 4:3,4).
"For you have spent enough time in the past doing what pagans choose to do: living in debauchery, lust, drunkenness, orgies, carousing and detestable idolatry."Easter Changes
Former homosexuals know what this means. It really was and still is the sum and identity of "gay" life.
They think it strange that you do not plunge with them into the same flood of dissipation, and they heap abuse on you."
Do the research on the gay community's hatred and malicious character assassinations of former homosexuals and you'll see that this scripture is chillingly accurate of what happens to men and women who leave homosexuality. Check out a few examples here, here and here.
If anybody was defined as a gay activist, it was K. Godfrey Easter. He's black which may explain why some of the white gays at XGW are already questioning his past homosexuality. When we were in the heat of the 2003 marriage wars in Georgia, Easter showed up with hundreds of other angry homosexuals. He carried a large, white sign which read: "GAY & GODLY". Before he relocated to Georgia, Easter was creating serious church problems in Tacoma, WA. Since we had common backgrounds, I interviewed him for an article I wrote here. Easter also wrote several times for the gay Christian webzine Whosoever and several other homosexual oriented publications. Strangely, Whosoever has deleted all of Easter's prior commentary from their site. If you google, you'll see Easter was there. I guess the "whosoever" is just a catchy phrase. He described himself as an "openly gay minister of music for a mainstream, Pentecostal church located in the greater Seattle area". He was honored at the Detroit's 2002 black gay pride. He has spoken at numerous homosexual events in the past. Is that gay enough for you?
According to Easter's new press release everything changed and he no longer embraces homosexuality. In fact, he intends to become just as active proclaiming change as he was proclaiming the "born gay theory".
But for the skeptics at
sexexgaywatch, Easter's change is a either hoax or...a hoax. This is how they insulate themselves from the reality of change. Be forewarned: the sexual orientation experts at XGW are a hard crowd of bonified (snicker) gays to please. Says "Christine":
"I don't think the issue is so much was he ever really gay (most people who are straight don't write books about being gay and christian and have photos and old pro-gay press releases available on their website)...While I realize that's [Jesus changed me] the popular definition of "ex-gay" within ex-gay circles, it's not my definition of ex-gay."
You heard it folks! Exgays cannot define themselves, only gays who are currently gay.