If you think that's strange, "gay christians" have one goal in their bit part on the gay rights acting stage. That is to refute the veracity of scripture. With every hook and crook, every shadowy doubt they can cast, these people are intent on proving the Bible is wrong and they are right. For the more
cunning enlightened ones, their contention is that the Bible has been misinterpreted, therefore arriving at the same conclusion as their denial-prone comrades. Or some other spiritual tomfoolery.
For example look at this twisted dissertation. Timothy Kincaid who is forging a stellar career as a professional gay christian with the exgaywatch conglomorate, posits that 1 Corinthians 6:9 is basically a made up translation. Even though the book's author, the Apostle Paul was one of the most highly educated Jews of his time, Kincaid swishingly dismisses Paul's intellect as well as his spiritual insight.
"I don’t know what the word selected in 1 Corinthians 6:9 means. Perhaps Paul was talking about same-sex activity, or alternately he meant those who bullied same-sex attracted persons. Perhaps he meant rapists, or maybe men who spent the day lounging in bed, or men with too many female slaves. Or maybe there was some cultural refernce that ironically had nothing more to do with men or beds than a lounge-lizard has to either lounging or lizards. I don’t know. And neither does Joe Dallas, James Dobson, or Alan Chambers.Let's decipher this: Not sure about 1Cor 6:9 because translations are really hard. Gee, why did God put together the Bible, only for us to be perpetually confused about it. And what about the scripture that says STUDY to show yourself approved unto God...? But that was written by Paul too so I guess its not applicable based on faulty translation. But, Kincaid is 100% sure (how convenient) that "one slang word" in the Bible isnt enough to sway him on the lofty beliefs of the APA and simular professional antiBible clones. Yet, this is selfprofessed Christian. Apostle Paul and the Word of God?: doubt them completely. APA and secular psychiatrists?: Believes them completely.
But I do know that building a doctrine and claiming that "sexual orientation can be changed" based on nothing more than one slang word that is confusing at best seems to me to be grasping and tortured."
Mark at Chester Street highlights another religious crazie in his excellent post False Doctrine makes False Converts.
These acts or whatever you want to call them are treacherous. To say that you are a follower of Christ, but then to go behind His back and stab Him (or kiss him Judas style)by refuting His word is maddening. "gay christians" are a breed unto themselves circulating a false gospel, authorized by a false jesus and ultimately producing false converts.
I addressed that here, here and here.
As the apostle Jude wrote we have to earnestly contend for the faith that was once delivered unto the saints. If we do not, we can expect these false christians --whether they are homosexual or heterosexual-- to enthone an antichist in the church.