The co$t of becoming gay

Disgruntled former Love In Action attendee, Peterson Tuscano has been going around the country spreading the news of his $30,000 exgay habit. Wagging his exgay experienced finger, he warns frightened homosexuals of the dangers of being exgay. Toscano claims that after he paid all this money, they failed to make him "straight." He only spent two years at LIA, claiming to the Memphis Commercial Appeal he paid "$950 a month for two years". Toscano claims he "joined fundamentalist, then evangelical, then Pentecostal, and finally, charismatic churches. He subjected himself to three exorcisms, including one by a Jamaican woman in New York City. " A Jamaican woman in New York City?? How is that exgay???

Toscano should know first of all that he could have saved that money and went straight (no pun intended) to God and got much more than just being straight-- for free.

So how much does it cost to get to the top of your gay game? You might not know it, but much more than it costs to become straight.

According to the Richmond Organization for Sexual Minority Youth a sexually confused teen at 13 would pay almost $42,000 to learn how be a gay leader. According to ROSMY, that's $2,427 a year for "leadership training and interpersonal development." Whatever that means. Of course, ROSMY doesn't say what that means.

Its been rumored that the official response from ROSMY's man-boy love hookups, is that the "website has not been updated". Wow, what an explanation! I suspect that soon we will start seeing "updates."

I was the first to tell you that the hypocritcal gay community screams loudly (read manufactured "outrage") about other's perceived sins, but blindly neglect their own.

Let me "entertain" your son...

Recently, gay activists have been up in arms about Memphis based Love In Action's program for teens who have homosexual issues. Among other names the program and ministry has been branded a "deprogramming camp" by detractors. But what alternatives does the gay community have for kids who are confused about their sexuality? You can get a pretty good idea from this group in Richmond, VA.

CALLING ROSMY MEN & BOYS:
· Do you want to go to some of Richmond’s hottest gay clubs for free?
· Educate men about the importance of safe sex and condom use?

Wow, parents! Just think, if your son comes out to you as "gay", in no time he can get hooked up teaching men how to put a condom on and get into "hottest" (that means sex)homosexual clubs.

This is what the Richmond Organization for Sexual Minority Youth (ROSMY) have in mind when they say want to "enhance the general well-being of sexual minority youth."

Why would any organization want to facilitate children interacting sexually with adults? There are no links to the rules for these kids, just invitations to learn about sex. Too bad ROSMY doesnt have the integrity of Love In Action which posts its rules for inhouse teens. Then again, why have rules for sexually hungry gay teens?
Maybe gregg_johnson@rosmy.org can explain.

I'll update after a little more investigating.

UPDATE ON ROSMY 07.29.05
ROSMY has removed references to man-boy sexual interactions from their website after the above post was published. Instead of posting an explanation as to why the references were removed, ROSMY simply left big blank spots. However, we still know that there were encouraging men and boys to interact sexually at some point. ROSMY how about an explanation as to your hasty retreat?
::DL

Gays under investigation for terrorism

From Protest Warrior- San Diego Chapter
SAN DIEGO - A Federal Grand Jury has issued subpoenas to several San Diego area homosexual activists for links to domestic terrorism. The Grand Jury is seeking information about individuals who may have attended an event at the Hillcrest Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transexual Center (aka “The Center”) on the evening of August 1, 2003.(see Aug 1 story).

The event had been hosted by the radical animal rights group Compassion for Farm Animals, and featured a lecture by convicted arsonist Rodney Coronado.

Coronado was convicted in 1994 of an arson attack on an animal research facility at Michigan State University, and served four years in a federal penitentiary. He had been invited to The Center to speak on the topic of “direct action,” a lecture that apparently included a primer on how to burn down a building.

Although Coronado does not appear to be a target of the investigation (he was reportedly in Tucson at the time the fire was set), the FBI apparently has reason to believe that the person or persons responsible for the University City fire was in attendance at Coronado’s August 1, 2003 lecture.

***
AUGUST 1, 2003 -- A massive fire sweeps through an under-construction condominium complex in the University City neighborhood of San Diego, burning it to the ground. The fire causes $50 million in damage, but fortunately does not spread to the neighboring canyon or (inhabited) apartment complexes. No deaths or injuries result. A banner reading "If you build it, we will burn it," with the initials "E.L.F.," is found at the site. The eco-terrorist group Earth Liberation Front claims responsibility for setting the blaze. Despite a lengthy FBI investigation, no arrests are made.

hat tip to: Richard

Do we or dont we?

Interesting. First, gays denied that exgays even existed.

Sylvia Pennington was the first one in 1989 to boldly declare such with her book "Exgays? There are none".

Journalist denies exgay existence

Questioned It

I guess that tactic didn't work. Now, they are "educating society about the existence of "ex-gay" ministries." Sans the recently formed "queer" action committee (look "about QAC"), they are now on a fire and brimstone, gayvangelical mission to tell the world that exgays do exist...and we are baaaaaaad people.
The mystery deepens.

Top 10 Myths

Well, it looks like I have been forced to clear up some myth-conceptions about Perspectives, so that my loyal readers will know what they can and cannot do on this blog. And to salvage my squeaky clean image from character assassins.

Myth #1 - A commenter can say whatever they want to say including insulting DL Foster without repercussions.
FACT - I will liberally use the D&B process to shut you down. D&B stands for delete and ban.

Myth #2 - Im not a Christian or a man if I use the D&B process.
FACT - The D&B process actually proves I am indeed a man and a Christian (and fairly intelligent, too).

Myth #3 - I owe you an explanation of what I write.
FACT - I owe you another post on what I don't owe you.

Myth #4 - DL Foster is a bigot.

FACT - That is subjective at best.

Myth #5 - DL Foster is homophobic.
FACT - No, but I really do hate rodents (childhood trauma).

Myth #6 - This blog is homophobic.
FACT - You are overusing that word. In about 4 years it will be obsolete from so much overusage.

Myth #7 - Exgays are homophobic.
FACT - There you go again! Youre about to take a D&B excursion!

Myth #8 - DL Foster is full of hate.
FACT - (See #4)

Myth #9 - DL Foster is getting rich writing this blog and making a pretty penny fighting gay rights, too.
FACT - That's not what my tax statements say.

Myth #10 - This blog is a hate site.
FACT - That's not true. It is not listed at hatewatch.org

Update: Are you wondering why after you stayed up all night telling DL Foster off, your comment dissapeared into thin air? Well wonder no longer. I perform regular comment clean up. If your comment attacks me personally, its fed to the deletion lions. If you do it a couple of more times, I ban you. You are free to argue your point as long as you like, but if you personally insult me, I will delete your comment without hesitation or explanation (youre getting that now). Happy commenting.

www.Hungry for Blood.com

Activist gays (and uhhh one nongay activist) show up with stones in hand.
I knew it would only be a matter of time before certain social vultures from the homosexual website "exgaywatch" would arrive here, stones in hand.

Well, its unfortunate, a great many of the gays residing at EGW are the political activist types (whom I focus on here) who make it their business to mock, accuse, berate, denigrate, lie, distort, character assasinate, and the likes. Their main focus is to dehumanize former homosexuals and our work but anyone who supports us or encourages us is dragged into the coliseum too.

Yet, when a thimble full of attention is turned on a few of their multiple social bloopers, they arrive to rant, rave and condemn about my not being a Christian. How amusing.

Its tactics like that: intimidation, group protests and wild eyed accusations which has served the activist homosexual movement well in attempting to beat America into submission. Want an example? Surely, I'll oblige.

Recently, a post on exgaywatch appeared stating "WORLD Magazine Attacks United Methodist Church For Tolerating Gay Church Group". One of the staff posters, Daniel Gonzales,urged gays at the site gang up and "point out the spiritual hypocrisy, elitism and ugliness..." of World Blog.

Would you like to see what got the social vultures in a feeding frenzy? Surely, I'll oblige.

Gay advocacy by Methodist church? On Labor Day weekend, the United Methodist Church’s main conference center will host “Hearts on Fire,” a homosexual rally. Reconciling Congregations, the homosexual group putting on the rally, seeks to overturn the church’s official stance on gays. “Since Lake Junaluska’s own internal rules require it to rent its facilities only to groups that share the ‘mission’ of the United Methodist Church, it seems highly inappropriate to rent those facilities for a rally for same-sex ‘marriage,’ homosexual clergy, and various exotic forms of sexual expression,” commented the Institute on Religion and Democracy's Mark Tooley. Posted by Whitney at July 22, 2005 10:17 AM

Yep, that's it. About 100 words or so. The comments that ensued are incredible.Read them for yourself. One even called the Bible "pornographic."

A word to exgaywatch: I'm doing the watching now.

WorldPride Tehran?

Blogger royalty LaShawn Barber issued a strong challenge to Jane Fonda (and the fondarites) daring them to "go to Iraq, pose for pictures with Islamofascists, and trash your country." With the manufactured outrage springing up in the gay community over reports of the Iranian government's hanging two gay teenagers, I'd like to issue a simular challenge to the hard headed organizers of Worldpride. Instead of desecrating the Holy City, why not go where you are really needed? Iran could probably use a good dose of your in-your-face pride. Tehran is just a little over 900 miles from Jerusalem, so logistics would not be a big problem. Take all the drag queens, gay Christians, AIDS activists, gay flags and go. I dare you.

gay teens and death

There is outrage (manufactured by the British gay group Outrage) over the hanging of two teenagers in Iran alledgedly **only** because of homosexuality.

While it 'offends' Western sensibilities and enrages the activist homosexual community, it also reveals a deep level of hypocrisy and selective outrage when gay teenagers mix it up with death.

Take for example the case of two Georgia gay teenagers who executed one of the girl's grandparents in cold blood, because they had been forbidden to see each other.

Was there any outrage from homosexuals? Nope, not a peep.
Take for example the case of 13 year Jesse Dirkhising who was murdered by two homosexual men after they used him for unmentionable sex acts. One of the murderers ate a sandwich while the boy lay on the floor dying. Any outrage from the gay community? nope. Not a peep. There was no loss of words. No shock expressed. No candlelit vigils. GLAAD, official keepers of the gay image flame, had one response to the news about the teenager's brutal murder: Christians were responding with homophobia.

But two Iranian teenagers are hanged according to their government's laws, and the outrage is boundless.

The problem I see is that homosexual activists quickly excuse or ignore cases where other homosexual criminals are in the drivers seat, but scream loudly when they are the "victims". It appears all they seek are martyrs (can you say Matthew Shepherd?) much like the terrorists who send suicide bombers in to ravage human life. It's just to advance their agenda, rather than being truly outraged at the loss of any human life. Doesn't that sort of selective devaluing of human life expose the "outrage" as nothing but agenda mongering?